Zur Seitenansicht
 

Titelaufnahme

Titel
Pichia pastoris regulates its gene-specific response to different carbon sources at the transcriptional, rather than the translational, level
VerfasserPrielhofer, Roland ; Cartwright, Stephanie P. ; Graf, Alexandra B. ; Valli, Minoska ; Bill, Roslyn M. ; Mattanovich, Diethard ; Gasser, Brigitte
Erschienen in
BMC Genomics, 2015, Jg. 16,
ErschienenBioMed Central (BMC), 2015
SpracheEnglisch
DokumenttypAufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Schlagwörter (EN)Pichia pastoris / Methylotrophic yeast / Crabtree-negative yeast / Polysome profiling / Microarray analysis / Transcriptome / Glucose repression / Carbon substrate repression / Methanol induction
ISSN1471-2164
URNurn:nbn:at:at-ubbw:3-1027 Persistent Identifier (URN)
DOIdoi:10.1186/s12864-015-1393-8 
Zugriffsbeschränkung
 Das Werk ist frei verfügbar
Dateien
Pichia pastoris regulates its gene-specific response to different carbon sources at the transcriptional, rather than the translational, level [1.79 mb]
Links
Nachweis
Klassifikation
Zusammenfassung (Englisch)

Background:

The methylotrophic, Crabtree-negative yeast Pichia pastoris is widely used as a heterologous protein production host. Strong inducible promoters derived from methanol utilization genes or constitutive glycolytic promoters are typically used to drive gene expression. Notably, genes involved in methanol utilization are not only repressed by the presence of glucose, but also by glycerol. This unusual regulatory behavior prompted us to study the regulation of carbon substrate utilization in different bioprocess conditions on a genome wide scale.

Results:

We performed microarray analysis on the total mRNA population as well as mRNA that had been fractionated according to ribosome occupancy. Translationally quiescent mRNAs were defined as being associated with single ribosomes (monosomes) and highly-translated mRNAs with multiple ribosomes (polysomes). We found that despite their lower growth rates, global translation was most active in methanol-grown P. pastoris cells, followed by excess glycerol- or glucose-grown cells. Transcript-specific translational responses were found to be minimal, while extensive transcriptional regulation was observed for cells grown on different carbon sources. Due to their respiratory metabolism, cells grown in excess glucose or glycerol had very similar expression profiles. Genes subject to glucose repression were mainly involved in the metabolism of alternative carbon sources including the control of glycerol uptake and metabolism. Peroxisomal and methanol utilization genes were confirmed to be subject to carbon substrate repression in excess glucose or glycerol, but were found to be strongly de-repressed in limiting glucose-conditions (as are often applied in fed batch cultivations) in addition to induction by methanol.

Conclusions:

P. pastoris cells grown in excess glycerol or glucose have similar transcript profiles in contrast to S. cerevisiae cells, in which the transcriptional response to these carbon sources is very different. The main response to different growth conditions in P. pastoris is transcriptional; translational regulation was not transcript-specific. The high proportion of mRNAs associated with polysomes in methanol-grown cells is a major finding of this study; it reveals that high productivity during methanol induction is directly linked to the growth condition and not only to promoter strength.