Zur Seitenansicht


Follow-up of pediatric celiac disease: value of antibodies in predicting mucosal healing, a prospective cohort study
VerfasserVécsei, Edith ; Steinwendner, Stephanie ; Kogler, Hubert ; Innerhofer, Albina ; Hammer, Karin ; Haas, Oskar A. ; Amann, Gabriele ; Chott, Andreas ; Vogelsang, Harald ; Schoenlechner, Regine ; Huf, Wolfgang ; Vécsei, Andreas
Erschienen in
BMC Gastroenterology, 2014, Jg. 14, 28 S.
ErschienenBioMed Central (BMC), 2014
DokumenttypAufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Schlagwörter (EN)Pediatrics / Celiac disease / Follow-up / Endomysial antibodies / Sensitivity / Specificity
URNurn:nbn:at:at-ubbw:3-490 Persistent Identifier (URN)
 Das Werk ist frei verfügbar
Follow-up of pediatric celiac disease: value of antibodies in predicting mucosal healing, a prospective cohort study [0.23 mb]
Zusammenfassung (Englisch)


In diagnosing celiac disease (CD), serological tests are highly valuable. However, their role in following up children with CD after prescription of a gluten-free diet is unclear. This study aimed to compare the performance of antibody tests in predicting small-intestinal mucosal status in diagnosis vs. follow-up of pediatric CD.


We conducted a prospective cohort study at a tertiary-care center. 148 children underwent esophohagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsies either for symptoms positive CD antibodies (group A; n = 95) or following up CD diagnosed 1 year before study enrollment (group B; n = 53). Using biopsy (Marsh 2) as the criterion standard, areas under ROC curves (AUCs) and likelihood-ratios were calculated to estimate the performance of antibody tests against tissue transglutaminase (TG2), deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) and endomysium (EMA).


AUCs were higher when tests were used for CD diagnosis vs. follow-up: 1 vs. 0.86 (P = 0.100) for TG2-IgA, 0.85 vs. 0.74 (P = 0.421) for TG2-IgG, 0.97 vs. 0.61 (P = 0.004) for DPG-IgA, and 0.99 vs. 0.88 (P = 0.053) for DPG-IgG, respectively. Empirical power was 85% for the DPG-IgA comparison, and on average 33% (range 1343) for the non-significant comparisons. Among group B children, 88.7% showed mucosal healing (median 2.2 years after primary diagnosis). Only the negative likelihood-ratio of EMA was low enough (0.097) to effectively rule out persistent mucosal injury. However, out of 12 EMA-positive children with mucosal healing, 9 subsequently turned EMA-negative.


Among the CD antibodies examined, negative EMA most reliably predict mucosal healing. In general, however, antibody tests, especially DPG-IgA, are of limited value in predicting the mucosal status in the early years post-diagnosis but may be sufficient after a longer period of time.